Should Your Company Drug Test?

Drug abuse is a massive problem in the Western world, especially in countries like the United States. This means that many private employers are investigating whether they should introduce mandatory drug testing and screening for existing workers and applicants. Drug testing in the workplace is nothing new. It’s been something that federal agencies, including the Department of Transport, have implemented for some time. But private companies are also beginning to realize that there are distinct benefits to testing, many of which can help them to save money in the long term. Why Drug Test? In most cases, whether or not to test for drugs is a decision that is often left to employers. In some safety-sensitive industries, like transport and logistics, as well as federal agencies like the Federal Aviation Administration and the Federal Highway Administration, drug testing is mandatory. But other than that, employers generally have free rein as to whether they want to implement a screening policy or not. Even though drug testing isn’t a requirement, many employers ultimately decide that they do want some kind of screening procedure in place. The biggest reason for this is to avoid legal liability. In some cases, an employer might be held legally liable if an employee under the influence of drugs causes injury to themselves or others at work. Drug and alcohol use at work may also violate health and...

Read More

How Accurate Are Panel Drug Tests

Drug use is a significant problem throughout the United States. The National Survey on Drug Use and Health found that more than 21.7 million people aged 12 or older required some form of substance abuse treatment in 2015, or around 7 percent of the entire US population. As a result of this, ever greater numbers of employers are looking for better ways to screen their workers to ensure that they are not currently misusing drugs. One of the methods for doing this is panel drug tests. There is no set definition of a panel drug test, but it is...

Read More

Mandatory Drug Test for all Welfare Recipients in 14 Sates & Canada

 John Trudel, originally published on The Huffington Post More and more we are seeing both in Canada & the US that drug tests are becoming mandatory for residents on welfare. Some governments are saying that if welfare applicants or recipients refuse to take the drug test, they will be denied welfare. https://drugtestsinbulk.com/drug_and_alcohol_information.html In the Province of Ontario, Canada, with over 460,000 people on welfare, the Progressive Conservative Ontario government wants to require people on welfare to take a drug test to see if they’re on the influence, something no other government in Canada does and refusal to do so would lead in immediate suspension of welfare. There has been much debate about this since the opposition challenging this idea says it violates basic human rights. The CBC reports that: The Human Rights Commission sent a letter to the government last year warning that denying welfare benefits to drug addicts is illegal. Source However, Minister John Baird indicated that the government’s plan is not meant to penalize people. To borrow his words: “It’s tough to get a job and hold a job if you’re addicted to drugs. These people are in desperate need of help and if we can turn just one life around, we’ve met with success,”Source In North Carolina, USA, one of 14 states including Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Utah have...

Read More

Lab Drug Testing

When a drug test is sent to the lab, the contents of the vial, swab, or container will be analyzed. It is a sterile environment with clear, yes-or-no answers. Does this person have marijuana in their system? Yes. Has this person used a particular drug within the last 24-hours? No. What these tests do not tell people, however, is context. Drug use is a land of gray area, within which clear-cut answers are few and far between. Drug tests are nonjudgmental by nature They are inanimate objects that cannot furrow a brow at a positive screen, or “tsk-tsk” at one’s choices. Yet somehow, human nature enters the pictures and, in doing so, inserts stigma and turned-up noses, scoffing at the fact that they too could have easily fallen into a situation where their own drug test would reflect substance use. The stigma is real—we see it in all things related to substance use. Alcoholics Anonymous, Cocaine Anonymous, mailing in drug tests rather than receiving results in person, or ensuring confidentiality in substance use treatment programs. Addiction is often under treated, so how are treatment efforts widened while minimizing the shame, the stigma, of substance use? The conversation needs to be more open, more accepting, and context has to be considered. We exist as a function of our circumstances and our situations; who we are does not exist in a vacuum....

Read More

Doping in Sports: What is it and how DOES it affect our Sportsmen?

The problem of doping in sports has rocked the sports world again this year. With Russia being banned from participating in the Olympics, at least their on-field athletes, it is about time that a panacea to both the athletes and the anti-doping officials will agree. Doping is a two-sided affair. This is because the vice has become more sophisticated to detect and thus measures of ensuring that the nutrients that athletes take do not give them an added advantage on the field have become more stringent. There is a thin line between nutrient enrichment for the athletes and doping (Sport’s Doping Game: Surveillance in the Biotech Age, 2011). Some cases of doping have shocked sports spectators and officials alike as the athlete claim that they have no idea what they have been eating is actually doping. If such a case exists, then the problem cannot be placed entirely on the athletes. The anti-doping officials need to inform all athletes in all disciplines what constitute doping and the nutrients that either directly or indirectly lead to doping. By indirectly, we mean that some nutrient undergo metabolism in the body producing certain products that are actually doping. It is about time that this thin line is addressed and information distributed to athletes before we condemn them. The use of drug testing to regularly monitor the presence or even the increasing popularity of seemingly unknown substances...

Read More

Which 5 Panel Test is Best?

There are multiple types of drug tests available. Drug testing is most commonly done by collecting hair, urine, saliva, perspiration and blood. Once ingested, the human body immediately begins to metabolize any drug creating drug metabolites. Most humans metabolize drugs at very similar rates. This is why any type of drug test will not be more or less accurate from one person to the next. However the level of accuracy each type of drug tests provides can be dependent on several other factors. The time that has elapsed or the time period that should be tested is the biggest factor. Drug testing with blood is the most accurate if it is believed that someone is currently under the influence of a drug. This is why the police use blood testing to determine whether or not someone is intoxicated or otherwise impaired. When it comes to determining if someone has used drugs in the recent past, urine testing is the most accurate, and most prefer the detection provided by 5 panel drug tests. Drug metabolites collect in the highest concentrations in the bladder making Urine testing the most accurate test if the person being tested is believed to have used the drug in the last 7 days. To get an accurate result when it has been more than 30 from the time the drug was ingested, hair must be used. Drug...

Read More